Download LXC Linux Containers
Author: c | 2025-04-24
Linux containers (LXC), is a lightweight operating system-level virtualization method that allows us to run multiple isolated Linux systems (containers) on a single host. lxc-openmandriva lxc-oracle lxc-sshd lxc-ubuntu-cloud lxc-altlinux lxc-busybox lxc-cirros lxc-download lxc-gentoo lxc-opensuse lxc-plamo lxc-ubuntu. To create a container
lxc/lxc: LXC - Linux Containers - GitHub
Team might have used on bare metal or VMs running on VirtualBox and other virtualized production environments. This portability makes migrating any application from a Linux server to running on LXC containers rather seamless, but only if you are not using containerization solutions already. The LXC command line provides essential commands that cover routine management tasks, including the creation, launch, and deletion of LXC containers. LXD images can be obtained from the built in image remotes, supplying an LXD remote, or manually importing a Linux image from a tarball. Once you’ve created and launched a container from an image, you can then run Linux commands in the container.Docker’s tooling is centered around the Docker CLI, with commands for listing, fetching, and managing Docker images. A public image registry, Docker Hub, provides access to a variety of images for commonly used applications. Notably, you can also download OS images, which lets you run, say, a Linux system in a Docker container. This is functionality that you would typically associate with LXC containers, which allow you to run OS systems without needing a VM. However, Docker containers aim to be even lighter weight in order to support the fast, highly scalable, deployment of applications with microservice architecture.Ecosystem and Cloud Support With backing from Canonical, LXC and LXD have an ecosystem tightly bound to the rest of the open source Linux community. The entire range of tools that work on VMs and Linux systems tend to work for LXC as well, after all, the containers on a LXC host system have Linux OS instances running within them. This means that your team won’t need to find an additional vendor for LXC specific tooling, since the tools you already use on Linux will work when your applications run on LXC containers. For managing your LXC containers, which may live on a single server or potentially thousands of nodes, the LXD hypervisor provides a clean REST API that you can use. LXD is implemented in Go, to ensure high performance and networking concurrency, with excellent integration with OpenStack and other Linux server systems. In contrast, Docker requires much more specialized support and has spawned off a sizable ecosystem, since the application container deployment model that it seeks to achieve is such a novel concept in the timeline of software deployments. The application container space is younger than the VM scene, and this results in a
Kodi in LXC containers - LXC - Linux Containers Forum
LXC Containers are a very quick way to create a psuedo virtual environment.In the previous LXC article, we explained how to install and configure LXC linux containers.In this tutorial, we’ll explain how to create a new Linux container, start the container, and login to the LXC virtual console to use the new container.For demonstration, we’ll be creating a CentOS LXC virtual container in this tutorial, but you can create virtual container for pretty much any Linux distro that you want.1. LXC Container TemplatesLinux Containers LXC by default provides container templates for several popular linux distros. The following are some of the LXC templates that you can use immediately.CentOSUbuntuFedoraOpenSUSEGentooDebianOracle LinuxArchLinuxAll available LXC templates are located under /usr/local/share/lxc/templates directory.# ls -1 /usr/local/share/lxc/templateslxc-alpinelxc-altlinuxlxc-archlinuxlxc-busyboxlxc-centoslxc-cirroslxc-debianlxc-downloadlxc-fedoralxc-gentoolxc-openmandrivalxc-opensuselxc-oraclelxc-plamolxc-sshdlxc-ubuntulxc-ubuntu-cloud2. Create a Container using lxc-createTo create the container, use lxc-create command as shown below.In the following command:–n option indicates the container name–t option indicates the template that is used to create the container. In this example, we are using lxc-centos template to create a CentOS container.In this example, this will create the CentOS container with centos minimal install. This will download all the packages that are required to run the CentOS minimal (for example, approximately around 140 packages), and install them as part of the MyCentOSContainer1 container# lxc-create -n MyCentOSContainer1 -t /usr/local/share/lxc/templates/lxc-centos/usr/local/share/lxc/templates/lxc-centosHost CPE ID from /etc/system-release-cpe: cpe:/o:centos:linux:6:GAdnsdomainname: Unknown hostChecking cache download in /usr/local/var/cache/lxc/centos/x86_64/6/rootfs ... Downloading centos minimal ......... Installing : libgcc-4.4.7-16.el6.x86_64 1/142 Installing : setup-2.8.14-20.el6_4.1.noarch 2/142 Installing : filesystem-2.4.30-3.el6.x86_64 3/142 ... Verifying : gzip-1.3.12-22.el6.x86_64 139/142 Verifying : mingetty-1.08-5.el6.x86_64 140/142 VerifyingWhat are the ways to create an LXC container? - LXC - Linux Containers
Can begin creating and managing containers using the “lxc” command.How to Use LXD on LinuxAfter installing and configuring LXD on your Linux system, you can start creating and managing containers. However, to do this, you must use the “lxc” command that comes with the LXD package. So, let’s start with our first example…List All the Remote ServerWhen setting up a container from an image, the image is pulled from a server, and the list of servers from which the image will be pulled can be listed using the following command:$ lxc remote listOutput:If you’re familiar with Docker, then you can compare it to Docker Hub, so when searching for an image or pulling it using the “lxc” command, it will look for the requested image on this remote server.Search for LXD ImagesTo pull your desired LXD image, you need to first ensure it’s available on the remote server. For that purpose, you can use the following command to list all the images on the mentioned remote server:# The following command will list all the images from the "images" server.$ lxc image list images:# The following command will list all the images from the "ubuntu" server.$ lxc image list ubuntu:# The following command will list all the images from the "ubuntu-daily" server.$ lxc image list ubuntu-daily:Output:The above output quickly becomes too long, so to quickly locate your desired image, if you have any specific image in mind, you can specify it by its name with or without version and architecture.# Search. Linux containers (LXC), is a lightweight operating system-level virtualization method that allows us to run multiple isolated Linux systems (containers) on a single host. lxc-openmandriva lxc-oracle lxc-sshd lxc-ubuntu-cloud lxc-altlinux lxc-busybox lxc-cirros lxc-download lxc-gentoo lxc-opensuse lxc-plamo lxc-ubuntu. To create a container Download LXC Linux Containers Download the latest version of the LXC from Linux Containers Project . Use wget to download the tar ball of the latest stable version of LXC to your machine as shown below.Cannot create privileged containers with lxc - LXC - Linux Containers
LXD (pronounced lex-dee) is a lightweight container manager that allows you to run Linux containers (LXC), a type of container similar to VMware that maintains its state even after a system reboot and uses the host system kernel.The LXC container creation process is similar to Docker containers, but they have their differences. First, as we discussed earlier, LXC containers can retain their state after a system reboot, unlike Docker containers, which wipe out all data.Another difference between Docker and LXD is the way they handle processes, which varies between them. When using multiple processors, LXD is faster than Docker for managing applications, whereas Docker is faster than LXD when using a single processor.Surprisingly, most Docker images can be seamlessly managed by LXD. However, a few might not run because LXD operates all containers in non-superuser mode, like Podman, which restricts users from performing certain actions.This article will show you how to install LXD on your desired Linux system, as well as how to create and manage your first LXC container.Tutorial DetailsHow to Install LXD on LinuxStep 1: Install Snap on LinuxStep 2: Install the LXD Snap PackageStep 3: Add the User to the LXD GroupStep 4: Initializing LXDHow to Use LXD on LinuxList All the Remote ServerSearch for LXD ImagesCreate a Container from the LXD ImageList All the ContainersExecute Commands Inside the ContainerStop the ContainerStart the ContainerRestart the ContainerPush a File to the ContainerPull a File from the ContainerManaging Snapshots of ContainersDelete the ContainerBonus Tip: Advanced Configuration of LXD ContainersFinalLinux Containers - LXC - Manpages - lxc.7
See why, with Docker taking the devops world by storm since its launch back in 2013. Docker’s popularity, however, is not an event in isolation, rather, the application containerization that Docker champions just happens to be a model that tech giants, among them Google, Netflix, Twitter, and other web-scale companies, have gravitated to for its scaling advantages.LXC, while older, has not been as popular with developers as Docker has proven to be. This is partly due to the difference in use cases that these two technologies focus on, with LXC having a focus on sys admins that’s similar to what solutions like the Solaris operating system, with its Solaris Zones, Linux OpenVZ, and FreeBSD, with its BSD Jails virtualization system. These solutions provide OS containers for a whole system, which is achieved, typically, by providing a different root for the filesystem, and creating environments that are isolated from each other and can’t share state. Docker went after a different target market, developers, and sought to take containers beyond the OS level to the more granular world of the application itself. While it started out being built on top of LXC, Docker later moved beyond LXC containers to its own execution environment called libcontainer. Unlike LXC, which launches an operating system init for each container, Docker provides one OS environment, supplied by the Docker Engine, and enables developers to easily run applications that reside in their own application environment which is specified by a docker image. Just like with LXC, these images can be shared among developers, with a dockerfile, in the case of Docker, automating the sequence of commands for building an image. The Docker user base is large and continues to grow, with ZDNet estimating the number of containerized applications at more than 3.5 million and billions of containerized applications downloaded using Docker. Linux powerhouses such as Red Hat and Canonical, the backers of Ubuntu, are firmly on the Docker bandwagon, as are even bigger tech companies like Oracle and Microsoft. With such adoption, it’s likely Docker will continue to outstrip LXC in popularity, though system containers like LXC have their place in virtualization of traditional applications that are difficult to port to the microservice architecture that’s popular these days. Tooling and CLI LXC tooling sticks close to what system administrators running bare metal servers are used to, with direct SSH access allowing the use of automation scripts yourLinux Containers - LXC - Man - lxc.7
Be easily managed via neat GUI management consoles and they don’t offer some other neat features of VM’s such as IaaS setups and live migration.So the VE crowd is not unlike the overclockers and modders of the CPU and computer hardware universe – they extract more utility from the standard machine in the market. But doing so calls for advanced technical skills, and results in a highly customized machine that’s not necessarily guaranteed to be interoperable with others. Also, if you don’t know what you’re doing, you will royally mess up your machine.What They DoThink of LXC as supercharged chroot on Linux. It allows you to not only isolate applications, but even the entire OS. Its helper scripts focus on creating containers as lightweight machines - basically servers that boot faster and need less RAM. There are two user-space implementations of containers, each exploiting the same kernel features:Libvirt, which allows the use of containers through the LXC driver by connecting to 'lxc:///'. This can be very convenient as it supports the same usage as its other drivers.Another implementation, called simply 'LXC', is not compatible with libvirt, but is more flexible with more userspace tools. It is possible to switch between the two, though there are peculiarities which can cause confusion.Docker, on the other hand, can do much more than this. Docker can offer the following capabilities:Portable deployment across machines: you can use Docker to create a single object containing all your bundled applications. This object can then be transferred and quickly installed onto any other Docker-enabled Linux host.Versioning: Docker includes git-like capabilities for tracking successive versions of a container, inspecting the diff between versions, committing new versions, rolling back etc.Component reuse: Docker allows building or stacking of already created packages. For instance, if you need to create several machines that all require Apache and MySQL database, you can create a ‘base image’ containing these two items, then build and create new machines using these already installed.Shared libraries: There is already a public registry ( ) where thousands have already uploaded the useful containers they have created. Again, think of the AWS common pool of different configs and distros – this is very similar.For a great list of Docker’s capabilities, see this thread on Stackoverflow: popularity were the only criteria for deciding between these two containerization technologies, then Docker would handily beat LXC and its REST tool, LXD. It’s easy toLinux Virtualization : Linux Containers (lxc)
Lot more fluidity. Docker now runs on Windows, and is supported by major cloud providers such as AWS, IBM, Google, and Microsoft Azure.Docker’s ecosystem includes the following set of tools:Docker Swarm - An orchestration tool to manage clusters of Docker containers Docker Trusted Registry - A private registry for trusted Docker imagesDocker Compose - A tool for launching applications with numerous containers that need to exchange data.Docker Machine - A tool for creating Docker-enabled virtual machines. There are more tools that help to fill out the entire stack, providing specialized functionality to support your Docker deployments. Docker Hub, Docker’s official open image registry, contains over 100,000 container images from open source contributors, vendors, and the Docker community. Ease Of UseDocker and LXC both provide ample documentation, with helpful guides for creating and deploying containers. Bindings and libraries exist for languages such as Python and Java, making it even easier for developer teams to use. When comparing the two technologies, however, Docker’s ever-growing ecosystem will take much more to manage. Docker might have become the standard for running containerized applications, with tools like Kubernetes and Docker Swarm providing the orchestration, however, the ecosystem comes with additional complexity. Part of this has to do with Docker’s key innovation of single-process containers, over and above the standard multiprocess containers that LXC provided. When Docker introduced this innovation, it inevitably led to downstream complexity for teams porting over traditional applications to a non-standard operating system environment. A lot more planning, architecture decisions and scripting to support applications has to be done. With LXC, a large part of this complexity is avoided since LXC runs a standard OS init for each container, providing a standard Linux operating system for your apps to live in. As a result, migrating from a VM or bare metal server is often easier to do if you are moving to LXC containers, unlike if you want to move to Docker containers. On the other hand, Docker’s approach makes working with containers easier for developer since they don’t have to use raw, low-level LXC themselves. This split between a systems admin and developer focus continues to characterize adoption of these tools.Related Container Technology As alluded to above, the world of containers is particularly dynamic, and involves a lot of innovation both around LXC, Docker, as well as alternative containerization technologies. What’s considered standard practice today can become old and substandard fairly. Linux containers (LXC), is a lightweight operating system-level virtualization method that allows us to run multiple isolated Linux systems (containers) on a single host. lxc-openmandriva lxc-oracle lxc-sshd lxc-ubuntu-cloud lxc-altlinux lxc-busybox lxc-cirros lxc-download lxc-gentoo lxc-opensuse lxc-plamo lxc-ubuntu. To create a container
VLANs and containers - LXC - Linux Containers Forum
To take a snapshot of the old container before you make any changes to the configuration on the container. You can use this as a simple backup method for container configuration.Cloning the container can be done using lxc-clone command as shown below. In this case, the new container name is MyCentOSContainer2# lxc-clone -o MyCentOSContainer1 -n MyCentOSContainer2Created container MyCentOSContainer2 as copy of MyCentOSContainer18. Delete an Existing Container using lxc-destoryTo delete an existing container, use lxc-destroy command as shown below.# lxc-destroy -n MyCentOSContainer29. Connect to LXC Linux Container ConsoleTo connect to the console of the container, use the following lxc-console command.# lxc-console -n MyCentOSContainer1Connected to tty 1Type Ctrl+a q to exit the console, Ctrl+a Ctrl+a to enter Ctrl+a itselfCentOS release 6.6 (Final)Kernel 2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64 on an x86_64MyCentOSContainer1 login:10. Change LXC Configurations using lxc-configTo change the LXC configuration, you can use lxc-config command.First, use lxc-config -l option, which will just display all the available configurations as shown below.# lxc-config -llxc.default_configlxc.lxcpathlxc.bdev.lvm.vglxc.bdev.lvm.thin_poollxc.bdev.zfs.rootlxc.cgroup.uselxc.cgroup.patternNext, use lxc.default_config option as shown below to view information about each configuration file and its associated parameters.# lxc-config lxc.default_config/usr/local/etc/lxc/default.conf# cat /usr/local/etc/lxc/default.conflxc.network.type = vethlxc.network.link = virbr0lxc.network.flags = upThe following command will display the LXC patch where all the containers are stored.# lxc-config lxc.lxcpath/usr/local/var/lib/lxcAs we see below, we see the two containers that we created under this directory.# cd /usr/local/var/lib/lxc# lsMyCentOSContainer1 MyCentOSContainer2Under the container directory, you’ll see the config file, which contains all the basic configuration information for that particular container as shown below.# cd /usr/local/var/lib/lxc/MyCentOSContainer1# vi configlxc.network.type = vethlxc.network.link = virbr0lxc.network.hwaddr = fb:bb:f2:87:e8:17lxc.network.flags = uplxc.rootfsTimezone in container - LXC - Linux Containers Forum
In the past few years, containers have become a hot topic among not just developers, but also enterprises. This growing interest has caused an increased need for security improvements and hardening, and preparing for scaleability and interoperability. This has necessitated a lot of engineering, and here's the story of how much of that engineering has happened at an enterprise level at Red Hat.When I first met up with representatives from Docker Inc. (Docker.io) in the fall of 2013, we were looking at how to make Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) use Docker containers. (Part of the Docker project has since been rebranded as Moby.) We had several problems getting this technology into RHEL. The first big hurdle was getting a supported Copy On Write (COW) file system to handle container image layering. Red Hat ended up contributing a few COW implementations, including Device Mapper, btrfs, and the first version of OverlayFS. For RHEL, we defaulted to Device Mapper, although we are getting a lot closer on OverlayFS support.The next major hurdle was on the tooling to launch the container. At that time, upstream docker was using LXC tools for launching containers, and we did not want to support LXC tools set in RHEL. Prior to working with upstream docker, I had been working with the libvirt team on a tool called virt-sandbox, which used libvirt-lxc for launching containers.At the time, some people at Red Hat thought swapping out the LXC tools and adding a bridge so the Docker daemon would. Linux containers (LXC), is a lightweight operating system-level virtualization method that allows us to run multiple isolated Linux systems (containers) on a single host. lxc-openmandriva lxc-oracle lxc-sshd lxc-ubuntu-cloud lxc-altlinux lxc-busybox lxc-cirros lxc-download lxc-gentoo lxc-opensuse lxc-plamo lxc-ubuntu. To create a containerLXC application container - Linux Containers Forum
LXC (LinuX Containers) is a OS-level virtualization technology that allows creation and running of multiple isolated Linux virtual environments (VE) on a single control host. These isolation levels or containers can be used to either sandbox specific applications, or to emulate an entirely new host. LXC uses Linux’s cgroups functionality, which was introduced in version 2.6.24 to allow the host CPU to better partition memory allocation into isolation levels called namespaces . Note that a VE is distinct from a virtual machine (VM), as we will see below.Docker, previously called dotCloud, was started as a side project and only open-sourced in 2013. It is really an extension of LXC’s capabilities. This it achieves using a high-level API that provides a lightweight virtualization solution to run processes in isolation. Docker is developed in the Go language and utilizes LXC, cgroups, and the Linux kernel itself. Since it’s based on LXC, a Docker container does not include a separate operating system; instead it relies on the operating system’s own functionality as provided by the underlying infrastructure. So Docker acts as a portable container engine, packaging the application and all its dependencies in a virtual container that can run on any Linux server.VE vs. VMSo what, one may ask, is the difference between these VE’s and a traditional VM? Well, the main difference is that in a VE there is no preloaded emulation manager software as in a VM. In a VE, the application (or OS) is spawned in a container and runs with no added overhead, except for a usually minuscule VE initialization process. There is no hardware emulation, which means that aside from the small memory software penalty, LXC will boast bare metal performance characteristics because it only packages the needed applications. Oh, and the OS is also just another application that can be packaged too. Contrast this to a VM, which packages the entire OS and machine setup, including hard drive, virtual processors and network interfaces. The resulting bloated mass usually takes a long time to boot and consumes a lot of CPU and RAM.Advantage: VE. So why haven’t VM’s already have gone the way of the dinosaur? The problem with VE’s is that, up to now at least, they cannot be neatly packaged into ready-made and quickly deployable machines – think of the flexibility and time saving offered by Amazon’s myriad AWS machine configs. Also, this means they cannotComments
Team might have used on bare metal or VMs running on VirtualBox and other virtualized production environments. This portability makes migrating any application from a Linux server to running on LXC containers rather seamless, but only if you are not using containerization solutions already. The LXC command line provides essential commands that cover routine management tasks, including the creation, launch, and deletion of LXC containers. LXD images can be obtained from the built in image remotes, supplying an LXD remote, or manually importing a Linux image from a tarball. Once you’ve created and launched a container from an image, you can then run Linux commands in the container.Docker’s tooling is centered around the Docker CLI, with commands for listing, fetching, and managing Docker images. A public image registry, Docker Hub, provides access to a variety of images for commonly used applications. Notably, you can also download OS images, which lets you run, say, a Linux system in a Docker container. This is functionality that you would typically associate with LXC containers, which allow you to run OS systems without needing a VM. However, Docker containers aim to be even lighter weight in order to support the fast, highly scalable, deployment of applications with microservice architecture.Ecosystem and Cloud Support With backing from Canonical, LXC and LXD have an ecosystem tightly bound to the rest of the open source Linux community. The entire range of tools that work on VMs and Linux systems tend to work for LXC as well, after all, the containers on a LXC host system have Linux OS instances running within them. This means that your team won’t need to find an additional vendor for LXC specific tooling, since the tools you already use on Linux will work when your applications run on LXC containers. For managing your LXC containers, which may live on a single server or potentially thousands of nodes, the LXD hypervisor provides a clean REST API that you can use. LXD is implemented in Go, to ensure high performance and networking concurrency, with excellent integration with OpenStack and other Linux server systems. In contrast, Docker requires much more specialized support and has spawned off a sizable ecosystem, since the application container deployment model that it seeks to achieve is such a novel concept in the timeline of software deployments. The application container space is younger than the VM scene, and this results in a
2025-04-19LXC Containers are a very quick way to create a psuedo virtual environment.In the previous LXC article, we explained how to install and configure LXC linux containers.In this tutorial, we’ll explain how to create a new Linux container, start the container, and login to the LXC virtual console to use the new container.For demonstration, we’ll be creating a CentOS LXC virtual container in this tutorial, but you can create virtual container for pretty much any Linux distro that you want.1. LXC Container TemplatesLinux Containers LXC by default provides container templates for several popular linux distros. The following are some of the LXC templates that you can use immediately.CentOSUbuntuFedoraOpenSUSEGentooDebianOracle LinuxArchLinuxAll available LXC templates are located under /usr/local/share/lxc/templates directory.# ls -1 /usr/local/share/lxc/templateslxc-alpinelxc-altlinuxlxc-archlinuxlxc-busyboxlxc-centoslxc-cirroslxc-debianlxc-downloadlxc-fedoralxc-gentoolxc-openmandrivalxc-opensuselxc-oraclelxc-plamolxc-sshdlxc-ubuntulxc-ubuntu-cloud2. Create a Container using lxc-createTo create the container, use lxc-create command as shown below.In the following command:–n option indicates the container name–t option indicates the template that is used to create the container. In this example, we are using lxc-centos template to create a CentOS container.In this example, this will create the CentOS container with centos minimal install. This will download all the packages that are required to run the CentOS minimal (for example, approximately around 140 packages), and install them as part of the MyCentOSContainer1 container# lxc-create -n MyCentOSContainer1 -t /usr/local/share/lxc/templates/lxc-centos/usr/local/share/lxc/templates/lxc-centosHost CPE ID from /etc/system-release-cpe: cpe:/o:centos:linux:6:GAdnsdomainname: Unknown hostChecking cache download in /usr/local/var/cache/lxc/centos/x86_64/6/rootfs ... Downloading centos minimal ......... Installing : libgcc-4.4.7-16.el6.x86_64 1/142 Installing : setup-2.8.14-20.el6_4.1.noarch 2/142 Installing : filesystem-2.4.30-3.el6.x86_64 3/142 ... Verifying : gzip-1.3.12-22.el6.x86_64 139/142 Verifying : mingetty-1.08-5.el6.x86_64 140/142 Verifying
2025-04-18LXD (pronounced lex-dee) is a lightweight container manager that allows you to run Linux containers (LXC), a type of container similar to VMware that maintains its state even after a system reboot and uses the host system kernel.The LXC container creation process is similar to Docker containers, but they have their differences. First, as we discussed earlier, LXC containers can retain their state after a system reboot, unlike Docker containers, which wipe out all data.Another difference between Docker and LXD is the way they handle processes, which varies between them. When using multiple processors, LXD is faster than Docker for managing applications, whereas Docker is faster than LXD when using a single processor.Surprisingly, most Docker images can be seamlessly managed by LXD. However, a few might not run because LXD operates all containers in non-superuser mode, like Podman, which restricts users from performing certain actions.This article will show you how to install LXD on your desired Linux system, as well as how to create and manage your first LXC container.Tutorial DetailsHow to Install LXD on LinuxStep 1: Install Snap on LinuxStep 2: Install the LXD Snap PackageStep 3: Add the User to the LXD GroupStep 4: Initializing LXDHow to Use LXD on LinuxList All the Remote ServerSearch for LXD ImagesCreate a Container from the LXD ImageList All the ContainersExecute Commands Inside the ContainerStop the ContainerStart the ContainerRestart the ContainerPush a File to the ContainerPull a File from the ContainerManaging Snapshots of ContainersDelete the ContainerBonus Tip: Advanced Configuration of LXD ContainersFinal
2025-04-22See why, with Docker taking the devops world by storm since its launch back in 2013. Docker’s popularity, however, is not an event in isolation, rather, the application containerization that Docker champions just happens to be a model that tech giants, among them Google, Netflix, Twitter, and other web-scale companies, have gravitated to for its scaling advantages.LXC, while older, has not been as popular with developers as Docker has proven to be. This is partly due to the difference in use cases that these two technologies focus on, with LXC having a focus on sys admins that’s similar to what solutions like the Solaris operating system, with its Solaris Zones, Linux OpenVZ, and FreeBSD, with its BSD Jails virtualization system. These solutions provide OS containers for a whole system, which is achieved, typically, by providing a different root for the filesystem, and creating environments that are isolated from each other and can’t share state. Docker went after a different target market, developers, and sought to take containers beyond the OS level to the more granular world of the application itself. While it started out being built on top of LXC, Docker later moved beyond LXC containers to its own execution environment called libcontainer. Unlike LXC, which launches an operating system init for each container, Docker provides one OS environment, supplied by the Docker Engine, and enables developers to easily run applications that reside in their own application environment which is specified by a docker image. Just like with LXC, these images can be shared among developers, with a dockerfile, in the case of Docker, automating the sequence of commands for building an image. The Docker user base is large and continues to grow, with ZDNet estimating the number of containerized applications at more than 3.5 million and billions of containerized applications downloaded using Docker. Linux powerhouses such as Red Hat and Canonical, the backers of Ubuntu, are firmly on the Docker bandwagon, as are even bigger tech companies like Oracle and Microsoft. With such adoption, it’s likely Docker will continue to outstrip LXC in popularity, though system containers like LXC have their place in virtualization of traditional applications that are difficult to port to the microservice architecture that’s popular these days. Tooling and CLI LXC tooling sticks close to what system administrators running bare metal servers are used to, with direct SSH access allowing the use of automation scripts your
2025-03-31Lot more fluidity. Docker now runs on Windows, and is supported by major cloud providers such as AWS, IBM, Google, and Microsoft Azure.Docker’s ecosystem includes the following set of tools:Docker Swarm - An orchestration tool to manage clusters of Docker containers Docker Trusted Registry - A private registry for trusted Docker imagesDocker Compose - A tool for launching applications with numerous containers that need to exchange data.Docker Machine - A tool for creating Docker-enabled virtual machines. There are more tools that help to fill out the entire stack, providing specialized functionality to support your Docker deployments. Docker Hub, Docker’s official open image registry, contains over 100,000 container images from open source contributors, vendors, and the Docker community. Ease Of UseDocker and LXC both provide ample documentation, with helpful guides for creating and deploying containers. Bindings and libraries exist for languages such as Python and Java, making it even easier for developer teams to use. When comparing the two technologies, however, Docker’s ever-growing ecosystem will take much more to manage. Docker might have become the standard for running containerized applications, with tools like Kubernetes and Docker Swarm providing the orchestration, however, the ecosystem comes with additional complexity. Part of this has to do with Docker’s key innovation of single-process containers, over and above the standard multiprocess containers that LXC provided. When Docker introduced this innovation, it inevitably led to downstream complexity for teams porting over traditional applications to a non-standard operating system environment. A lot more planning, architecture decisions and scripting to support applications has to be done. With LXC, a large part of this complexity is avoided since LXC runs a standard OS init for each container, providing a standard Linux operating system for your apps to live in. As a result, migrating from a VM or bare metal server is often easier to do if you are moving to LXC containers, unlike if you want to move to Docker containers. On the other hand, Docker’s approach makes working with containers easier for developer since they don’t have to use raw, low-level LXC themselves. This split between a systems admin and developer focus continues to characterize adoption of these tools.Related Container Technology As alluded to above, the world of containers is particularly dynamic, and involves a lot of innovation both around LXC, Docker, as well as alternative containerization technologies. What’s considered standard practice today can become old and substandard fairly
2025-04-05