Download molecular descriptor correlations
Author: b | 2025-04-25
with the selected molecules, creating new models, and selecting different molecular descriptors types and descriptor correlations. 3. Download Molecule Descriptors Correlations Molecular Descriptors Correlations allows you to download selected molecular descriptors in a csv format that can be opened in spreadsheets. 4. Molecular Descriptors Correlation download It is a free tool for the analysis of molecular descriptor correlations. Download Review Comments Questions Answers .
The correlations of the molecular descriptors with
That "... the examples given clearly show the high-quality results based on optimal molecular descriptors ...", as it really is, the comparison of both sets of results here is useful to derive some valid conclusions on the present method employing CWLIMG.The average deviations are lower for our calculations, and it results more meaningful when on takes into account that data taken from ref. 4 is based upon a two variables equation (descriptors p1 and p2, i.e. weighted paths of length one and length two, respectively, Eqs. 7 and 10 in ref.4). Besides, one must take into account that our results for the molecular test set are completely predictive, that is to say, they were no included in the molecular set employed to determine the fitting equation, while the Randic and Basak's results do not make this differentiation (i.e. the whole set of 58 molecules was used to calculate the regression relationships), so that there is not any genuine prediction within their values. In order to justify our claim of having gotten better results, it is instructive to note that, in general, the statistical parameters for the test set are even better than those of Randic and Basak's corresponding values for the whole set of 58 molecules. Another way to recognize the better quality of our predictions is considering the number of predicted bp with a deviation larger than 5°C. In fact, our predicted set of bp registers just 4 cases, while Randic and Basak's data present 10 predictions with a deviation larger than 5°C.We have tried other alternative ways to choose the members of the training and test sets, but final results are practically the same. IV - ConclusionsThe results presented in this paper clearly show the very good outcomes arising from the use of the CWLIMG which, on one hand uses just only one molecular descriptor and on the other hand give correlations with significative reduced deviations with regard to other similar approaches. It seems to be a very good prospect in resorting to molecular descriptors having an intrinsic flexibility, as it is the case of the present one, because they yield quite satisfactory predictions.In addition, it is not necessary to employ higher order polynomial relationships in order to improve linear equations or/and to be dependent upon the choice of the training set to get the most suitable fitting equation.Present results agree with those published before on the use of CWLIMG /14-18/ and they further illuminate the appropriateness of using this molecular descriptor within the realm of QSAR/QSPR theory.Perhaps, before establishing more definitive conclusions about the goodness degree of this sort of flexible molecular descriptor it should be necessary and convenient to study other molecular sets and/or other physical chemistry properties and biological activities. At present, research along these lines are under development in our laboratories and results will be published elsewhere in the near future. ReferencesTrinajstic, N. Chemical Graph Theory, 2nd revised edition; CRC Press: Boca Raton, Floirda, 1992; Chapter 3. [Google Scholar]Turro, N. J. Angew. Chem. Int. Defines a “degree” of an atom as the number of adjacent non-hydrogen atoms • Bond connectivity value is the reciprocal of the square root of the product of the degree of the two atoms in the bond. • Branching index is the sum of the bond connectivities over all bonds in the molecule. • Chi indexes – introduces valence values to encode sigma, pi, and lone pair electronsKappa Shape Indexes • Characterize aspects of molecular shape • Compare the molecule with the “extreme shapes” possible for that number of atoms • Range from linear molecules to completely connected graph2D Fingerprints • Two types: • One based on a fragment dictionary • Each bit position corresponds to a specific substructure fragment • Fragments that occur infrequently may be more useful • Another based on hashed methods • Not dependent on a pre-defined dictionary • Any fragment can be encoded • Originally designed for substructure searching, not for molecular descriptorsAtom-Pair Descriptors • Encode all pairs of atoms in a molecule • Include the length of the shortest bond-by-bond path between them • Elemental type plus the number of non-hydrogen atoms and the number of π-bonding electronsBCUT Descriptors • Designed to encode atomic properties that govern intermolecular interactions • Used in diversity analysis • Encode atomic charge, atomic polarizability, and atomic hydrogen bonding abilityDESCRIPTORS BASED ON 3D REPRESENTATIONS • Require the generation of 3D conformations • Can be computationally time consuming with large data sets • Usually must take into account conformational flexibility • 3D fragment screens encode spatial relationships between atoms, ring centroids, and planesPharmacophore Keys & Other 3D Descriptors • Based on atoms or substructures thought to be relevant for receptor binding • Typically include hydrogen bond donors and acceptors, charged centers, aromatic ring centers and hydrophobic centers • Others: 3D topographical indexes, geometric atom pairs, quantum mechanical calculations for HUMO and LUMODATA VERIFICATION AND MANIPULATION • Data spread and distribution • Coefficient of variation (standard deviation divided by the mean) • Scaling (standardization): making sure that each descriptor has an equal chance of contributing to the overall analysis • Correlations • Reducing the dimensionality of a data set: Principal Components AnalysisMolecular Descriptors Correlation Download - It is a
Occurrences in molecular datasets. A structural pattern refers to a specific arrangement of atoms and bonds within a molecule, identifiable and characterizable as a substructure. These patterns represent recurring molecular features, such as functional groups or distinct atom connectivities. Structural patterns play a pivotal role in cheminformatics, particularly in structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies, pattern recognition, and the prediction of molecular properties and behavior.In alvaDesc, structural patterns are defined using the SMARTS syntax.Other FeaturesOne of the most innovative features of alvaDesc is its capability to handle both full-connected and non-full-connected molecular structures, such as salts and ionic liquids. All of the molecular descriptor calculation algorithms provide different theoretical approaches for the calculation of molecular descriptors on such structures.Different tools are provided to carry out a first exploration of your molecular dataset:Molecule structure verification using PubChem and Google Patents servicesMolecule structure visualisation and filteringPrincipal Component Analysis (PCA), t-SNE and correlation analysisDue to its capability of calculating large numbers of molecular descriptors, alvaDesc provides variable reduction tools, including the fast V-WSP method (variable reduction method adapted from space-filling designs).VideoA short video introduction:PlatformsThe software is 64bit and it’s available for Windows, Linux and macOS. It is provided both as an easy to use command line tool and as an intuitive graphical interface.With the release of alvaDesc 3.0, experience significantly enhanced calculation speeds on M Series processors. Learn more about the benchmarking results and performance improvements here.Performance comparison of descriptor calculation times for 2D (4,215 descriptors) and all descriptors (5,799 descriptors, including 3D) across three configurations: Intel Mac (x86_64), Apple Silicon via Rosetta 2, and native Apple Silicon. Native Apple Silicon builds significantly reduce computation time, demonstrating the benefits of optimized support for M Series processors.How to CiteIf you reference alvaDesc in an academic paper or publication, you can find the correct citation for your version by:Running alvaDescGUI and selecting “About alvaDesc” from the menuUsing the command alvaDescCLI –citeAdditionally, please consider citing the following papers:Mauri, A. (2020). alvaDesc: A Tool to Calculate and Analyze Molecular Descriptors and Fingerprints. In K. Roy (Ed.), Ecotoxicological QSARs (pp. 801–820). Humana Press Inc. A., & Bertola, M. (2022). Alvascience: A New Software Suite for the QSAR Workflow Applied to the Blood–Brain Barrier Permeability. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(21), 12882. perfect tool to prepare your molecular dataset for alvaDesc is alvaMoleculeCreate QSAR/QSPR models with alvaModel starting from an alvaDesc projectA tutorial showing how to build a QSAR model using. with the selected molecules, creating new models, and selecting different molecular descriptors types and descriptor correlations. 3. Download Molecule Descriptors Correlations Molecular Descriptors Correlations allows you to download selected molecular descriptors in a csv format that can be opened in spreadsheets. 4.Correlation matrix of molecular descriptors.
His co-workers have implemented molecular docking using AutoDock 4.2 Suite with Lamarckian genetic algorithm (LGA) as shown in Fig. 16 and the predicted binding energy was found to be − 2.32 kcal/mol, that indicates a stable absorption because of potential interactions on the surface.Fig. 16Docked complex structure of UiO-66(Zr) metal organic framework (MOF) and chrysene (CRY), a toxic and hazardous polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) pollutant using AutoDock 4.2 [115]. UiO-66(Zr) MOF (receptor) and CRY (ligand) are shown in stick and ball-and-stick models, respectively. UiO-66(Zr) is marked in white, violet, and red color. Four benzene rings of CRY are marked in blue and light gray color [115]. (Color figure online)Full size imageThe calculate energy due to different types of interaction potentials, such as van der Waals, hydrogen bonding and desolvation was − 3.1 kcal/mol and electrostatic was 0.79 kcal/mol. CRY was found to show electrostatic interaction with Zr4+ ion of the MOF.To understand the cause of instant isotopic exchange reaction in silver nanoparticles cluster, Chakraborty et al. have carried out molecular docking study between two [Ag25(DMBT)18]− (DBMT for 2,4-dimethylbenzenethiol, which acts as a protecting ligand) clusters using AutoDock 4.2 with Lamarckian genetic algorithm [100, 116]. [Ag25(DMBT)18]− has been used both as receptor and ligand in the docking process. The binding energy was found to be − 23.7 kcal/mol. The docking result with least binding energy is shown in Fig. 17.Fig. 17Docked complex structure of two [Ag25(DMBT)18]− clusters using AutoDock 4.2 [100, 115]. Complex is shown in ball-and-stick model. Silver (Ag) and sulfur (S) atoms are shown in gray and yellow, respectively. C–H… π interactions are viewed in green dotted lines. Hydrogen (H) atoms and benzene rings associated with these interactions are viewed in red and blue, respectively. Other benzene rings not associated with these interactions are shown in green [116]. (Color figure online)Full size imageThe fluorescent cobalt oxide (CoO) umbelliferone nanoconjugate having anti-cancer activity can be used both as a drug and carrier. Ali et al. have conducted molecular docking studies applying the protein docking program, HEX 8.0.0 using Spherical Polar Fourier Correlations technique to find the binding interactions of the CoO-drug nanoconjugate with the B-DNA dodecamer (also called as Calf thymus DNA (CT-DNA)), a DNA duplex having the sequence (CGCGAATTCGCG)2 (PDB ID: 1BNA) and human serum albumin (HSA) (PDB ID: 1H9Z) protein separately [117,118,119]. The most stable docking results with least binding energies of the CoO-drug nanoconjugate against the DNA molecule and interactions in the binding cavity of the CT-DNA are shown in Fig. 18A, B. The docking study predicted the existence of electrostatic, hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding intermolecular noncovalent interactions between them. Similarly, the most stable bound conformation of the docking result of the CoO-drug nanoconjugate and HSA protein with binding site interactions, such as hydrophobic, hydrogen bonding and metal acceptor are shown in Fig. 19A, B.Fig. 18A Molecular docking complex of calf thymus DNA (CT-DNA) (PDB ID: 1BNA) and cobalt oxide (CoO) umbelliferone drug nanoconjugate using HEX 8.0.0 [117, 118]. DNA is represented in carton and surface view. The drug nanoconjugate, a mixture of CoO nanoparticle (blue and red sphered view) and umbelliferone drug (green, red, and white sphered view). B Non-covalent interactions of DNA bases with the nanoconjugate depicted by dashed lines [117]. (Color figure online)Full size imageFig. 19A Docking result of human serum albumin (HSA) with the CoO-umbelliferone drug nanoconjugate by protein docking program, HEX 8.0.0 using Spherical Polar Fourier Correlations technique [117,118,119]. B Binding interactions of noncovalent type between neighboring amino acid residues in the binding pocket of HSA and the drug nanoconjugate shown in dashed lines [117]. (Color figure online)Full size imageInorganic–inorganicIn this case, both receptor and ligand in docking study are inorganic. The interaction study between any two chemical molecules that do not have any carbon-hydrogen bond comes under this category. To the best of our knowledge, there has not been any study carried out on inorganic receptor and ligand docking till now.Challenges in molecular dockingThere are many limitations and challenges in docking techniques [15]. A docking result predicted may not be accurate and match the result found in an experimental approach. (i) Recognition of different types of molecular features which contribute to the interaction between them can be complex, difficult to understandThe correlations of the molecular descriptors with experimentally
Aid decision making for scientists involved in drug discovery. StarDrop is a chemically aware data analysis package that allows you to quickly explore structure activity. It is easy to create multiple plots to compare data, and selection in one plot (in the image below the most active NK2 ligands were selected) automatically selects the corresponding molecules in all other plots and in the molecular spreadsheet. StarDrop comes with a variety of physicochemical property descriptor calculations and several ADME models are also available (Brain penetration, HERG and human intestinal absorption).There are now links to external applications via plugins that link to Derek Nexus (Toxicity prediction) and Torch3D (Cresset’s field-based searching).VortexVortex is a chemically aware data analysis and spreadsheet tool from Dotmatics. You can import files or from a SQL database and do substructure or structural similarity searches. Calculate many physicochemical properties and perform data analysis and display.The ability to have multiple interactive plots of the data alongside grids of the highlighted structures is an enormous aid to understanding the data. All plots are linked such that selection in one plot is automatically selected in all other plots and spreadsheets.One of the very attractive features of Vortex is the availability of scripts that extend the capabilities of the applications. These can be used to extend the number of chemical descriptors available and also link to molecular modelling programs like MOE, statistical packages like R, or search and import information from databases and interact with web services.FAMEFAME DOI is a collection of randomMolecular Descriptor Correlations 1.0 - Download
Between structure and property.This paper in organized as follows: next section deals with the definition and illustration of the chosen molecular descriptors based on the optimization of correlation weights of local graph invariants. Then we show the numerical results obtained via first, second and third order polynomial relationships for a selected set of alkyl alcohols and comparing them with previous results derived on the basis of a similar set of molecular descriptors. Section 4 is devoted to discuss the results, analyzing the similarities and significative differences with regard to other equivalent approaches. The final section is devoted to present the main conclusions derived from this study and finally several possible future extensions are pointed out. II - Correlation Weights of Local Graph InvariantsThe last three decades witnessed a meaningful upsurge of interest in applications of graph theory in chemistry. As pointed out before, constitutional formulae of molecules are chemical graphs where vertices represent the set of atoms and edges stand for chemical bonds. The pattern of connectedness of atoms in a molecule is preserved by constitutional graphs. Chemists have since long relied on visual perception to relate various aspects by constitutional graphs to observable phenomena. However, a clear and quantitative understanding of the structural basis of chemistry demands the use of precise mathematical techniques. The applications of matrix theory, graph theory, group theory and information theory to chemical graphs have produced results which are important in chemistry /5-13/.Most molecular descriptors in QSAR/QSPR theory are rather "rigid" in the sense the algorithm for their construction is fixed so that once the molecule is selected, the invariant under consideration can be computed exactly. There are a large number of this sort of molecular descriptors and they have shown to be rather suitable /4/. However, there exists another separate class of molecular descriptors having an intrinsic flexibility involving a variable part that can be adjusted and optimized for different applications. Thus, the employment of weighted paths for alkyl alcohols have shown to extend enormously the approach of variable descriptors to molecules of different chemical composition /4/.An alternative proposal for this kind of molecular descriptors is the Correlation Weights of the Local Invariants of Molecular Graphs (CWLIMG) introduced originally by one of us (AAT) /14-16/ and soon afterwards it was applied to study some physical chemistry properties /17,18/. Results were encouraging enough to promote new efforts to apply this new descriptor for studying other physical chemistry properties.The CWLIMG approach is based upon the following scheme. The primary units of analysis are the atoms with their corresponding vertex degrees. Then, graphs invariants are formulated in the general form D = f {CW(a(i)), CW(νi)} (1) where (2) aij is an element of the adjacency matrix A,νi is the vertex degree value of the i-th vertex, defined as (3) CW(a(i)) and CW(νi) are the correlation weights corresponding to atom i.Correlation weights are calculated by means of an optimization procedure, i.e. they are determined in such a way to yield the best correlation coefficient for the relationship where. with the selected molecules, creating new models, and selecting different molecular descriptors types and descriptor correlations. 3. Download Molecule Descriptors Correlations Molecular Descriptors Correlations allows you to download selected molecular descriptors in a csv format that can be opened in spreadsheets. 4.Download Molecular Descriptors Correlation by Milano
Author / Affiliation / Email Article Menu Font Type: Arial Georgia Verdana Open AccessArticle by Germán Krenkel 1, Eduardo A. Castro 2,* and Andrey A. Toropov 3 1 Departamento de Ingeniería de la Producción, Ingeniería Industrial, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Calles 1 y 47, La Plata 1900, Argentina 2 CEQUINOR, Departamento de Química Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, C.C. 962, La Plata 1900, Argentina 3 Vostok Innovation Company, S. Azimstreet 4, 700047 Tashkent, Uzbekistan * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Submission received: 29 November 2000 / Accepted: 20 March 2001 / Published: 7 May 2001 Abstract: We report the calculation of boiling points for several alkyl alcohols through the use of improved molecular descriptors based on the optimization of correlation weights of local invariants of graphs. As local invariants we have used the presence of different chemical elements (i.e. C, H, and O) and the existence of different vertex degree values (i.e. 1, 2, 3 and 4). The inherent flexibility of the chosen molecular descriptor seems to be rather suitable to obtain satisfactory enough predictions of the property under study. Comparison with other similar approximation reveals a very good behavior of the present method. The use of higher order polynomials do not seem to be necessary to improve results regarding the simple linear fitting equations. Some possible future extensions are pointed out in order to achieve a more definitive conclusion about this approximation. I - IntroductionThe relationship between molecules and graphs can be considered as a sort of isomorphism. In fact, if vertices are viewed as atoms and edges as bonds, then graphs represent models of chemical structures /1,2/. Conversely, if atoms in a molecule are interpreted as vertices and bonds as edges, then molecules are but illustrations of graphs /3/. That is to say, molecules have all those properties that the corresponding graphs have, but it is evident that molecules possess many additional properties that go beyond the mere consequences of the simple connectivity features that graphs encode. Therefore, the use of graphs as molecular models gives way to a basic problem within the realm of QSAR/QSPR (Quantitative Structure Activity Relationships/Quantitative Structure Property Relationships) theory and we can pose it asking how to select those graphs invariants (molecular descriptors) that can be reliable enough to establish a suitable relationship between biological activities/physicochemical properties and structure?The aim of this paper is to deal with this pivotal issue in relation to the calculation of boiling points (bp) for a selected set of alkyl alcohols. We take as a reference study a recent paper on optimal molecular descriptors based on weighted path numbers /4/. The main idea is to resort to the construction of suitable descriptors for optimization through the introduction of an intrinsic flexibility degree involving a variable part that can be improved in different applications. This feature allows one to gain a freedom degree which hopefully should lead us to have better molecular descriptors and, consequently, more satisfactory mathematical relationshipsComments
That "... the examples given clearly show the high-quality results based on optimal molecular descriptors ...", as it really is, the comparison of both sets of results here is useful to derive some valid conclusions on the present method employing CWLIMG.The average deviations are lower for our calculations, and it results more meaningful when on takes into account that data taken from ref. 4 is based upon a two variables equation (descriptors p1 and p2, i.e. weighted paths of length one and length two, respectively, Eqs. 7 and 10 in ref.4). Besides, one must take into account that our results for the molecular test set are completely predictive, that is to say, they were no included in the molecular set employed to determine the fitting equation, while the Randic and Basak's results do not make this differentiation (i.e. the whole set of 58 molecules was used to calculate the regression relationships), so that there is not any genuine prediction within their values. In order to justify our claim of having gotten better results, it is instructive to note that, in general, the statistical parameters for the test set are even better than those of Randic and Basak's corresponding values for the whole set of 58 molecules. Another way to recognize the better quality of our predictions is considering the number of predicted bp with a deviation larger than 5°C. In fact, our predicted set of bp registers just 4 cases, while Randic and Basak's data present 10 predictions with a deviation larger than 5°C.We have tried other alternative ways to choose the members of the training and test sets, but final results are practically the same. IV - ConclusionsThe results presented in this paper clearly show the very good outcomes arising from the use of the CWLIMG which, on one hand uses just only one molecular descriptor and on the other hand give correlations with significative reduced deviations with regard to other similar approaches. It seems to be a very good prospect in resorting to molecular descriptors having an intrinsic flexibility, as it is the case of the present one, because they yield quite satisfactory predictions.In addition, it is not necessary to employ higher order polynomial relationships in order to improve linear equations or/and to be dependent upon the choice of the training set to get the most suitable fitting equation.Present results agree with those published before on the use of CWLIMG /14-18/ and they further illuminate the appropriateness of using this molecular descriptor within the realm of QSAR/QSPR theory.Perhaps, before establishing more definitive conclusions about the goodness degree of this sort of flexible molecular descriptor it should be necessary and convenient to study other molecular sets and/or other physical chemistry properties and biological activities. At present, research along these lines are under development in our laboratories and results will be published elsewhere in the near future. ReferencesTrinajstic, N. Chemical Graph Theory, 2nd revised edition; CRC Press: Boca Raton, Floirda, 1992; Chapter 3. [Google Scholar]Turro, N. J. Angew. Chem. Int.
2025-04-08Defines a “degree” of an atom as the number of adjacent non-hydrogen atoms • Bond connectivity value is the reciprocal of the square root of the product of the degree of the two atoms in the bond. • Branching index is the sum of the bond connectivities over all bonds in the molecule. • Chi indexes – introduces valence values to encode sigma, pi, and lone pair electronsKappa Shape Indexes • Characterize aspects of molecular shape • Compare the molecule with the “extreme shapes” possible for that number of atoms • Range from linear molecules to completely connected graph2D Fingerprints • Two types: • One based on a fragment dictionary • Each bit position corresponds to a specific substructure fragment • Fragments that occur infrequently may be more useful • Another based on hashed methods • Not dependent on a pre-defined dictionary • Any fragment can be encoded • Originally designed for substructure searching, not for molecular descriptorsAtom-Pair Descriptors • Encode all pairs of atoms in a molecule • Include the length of the shortest bond-by-bond path between them • Elemental type plus the number of non-hydrogen atoms and the number of π-bonding electronsBCUT Descriptors • Designed to encode atomic properties that govern intermolecular interactions • Used in diversity analysis • Encode atomic charge, atomic polarizability, and atomic hydrogen bonding abilityDESCRIPTORS BASED ON 3D REPRESENTATIONS • Require the generation of 3D conformations • Can be computationally time consuming with large data sets • Usually must take into account conformational flexibility • 3D fragment screens encode spatial relationships between atoms, ring centroids, and planesPharmacophore Keys & Other 3D Descriptors • Based on atoms or substructures thought to be relevant for receptor binding • Typically include hydrogen bond donors and acceptors, charged centers, aromatic ring centers and hydrophobic centers • Others: 3D topographical indexes, geometric atom pairs, quantum mechanical calculations for HUMO and LUMODATA VERIFICATION AND MANIPULATION • Data spread and distribution • Coefficient of variation (standard deviation divided by the mean) • Scaling (standardization): making sure that each descriptor has an equal chance of contributing to the overall analysis • Correlations • Reducing the dimensionality of a data set: Principal Components Analysis
2025-04-12Occurrences in molecular datasets. A structural pattern refers to a specific arrangement of atoms and bonds within a molecule, identifiable and characterizable as a substructure. These patterns represent recurring molecular features, such as functional groups or distinct atom connectivities. Structural patterns play a pivotal role in cheminformatics, particularly in structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies, pattern recognition, and the prediction of molecular properties and behavior.In alvaDesc, structural patterns are defined using the SMARTS syntax.Other FeaturesOne of the most innovative features of alvaDesc is its capability to handle both full-connected and non-full-connected molecular structures, such as salts and ionic liquids. All of the molecular descriptor calculation algorithms provide different theoretical approaches for the calculation of molecular descriptors on such structures.Different tools are provided to carry out a first exploration of your molecular dataset:Molecule structure verification using PubChem and Google Patents servicesMolecule structure visualisation and filteringPrincipal Component Analysis (PCA), t-SNE and correlation analysisDue to its capability of calculating large numbers of molecular descriptors, alvaDesc provides variable reduction tools, including the fast V-WSP method (variable reduction method adapted from space-filling designs).VideoA short video introduction:PlatformsThe software is 64bit and it’s available for Windows, Linux and macOS. It is provided both as an easy to use command line tool and as an intuitive graphical interface.With the release of alvaDesc 3.0, experience significantly enhanced calculation speeds on M Series processors. Learn more about the benchmarking results and performance improvements here.Performance comparison of descriptor calculation times for 2D (4,215 descriptors) and all descriptors (5,799 descriptors, including 3D) across three configurations: Intel Mac (x86_64), Apple Silicon via Rosetta 2, and native Apple Silicon. Native Apple Silicon builds significantly reduce computation time, demonstrating the benefits of optimized support for M Series processors.How to CiteIf you reference alvaDesc in an academic paper or publication, you can find the correct citation for your version by:Running alvaDescGUI and selecting “About alvaDesc” from the menuUsing the command alvaDescCLI –citeAdditionally, please consider citing the following papers:Mauri, A. (2020). alvaDesc: A Tool to Calculate and Analyze Molecular Descriptors and Fingerprints. In K. Roy (Ed.), Ecotoxicological QSARs (pp. 801–820). Humana Press Inc. A., & Bertola, M. (2022). Alvascience: A New Software Suite for the QSAR Workflow Applied to the Blood–Brain Barrier Permeability. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(21), 12882. perfect tool to prepare your molecular dataset for alvaDesc is alvaMoleculeCreate QSAR/QSPR models with alvaModel starting from an alvaDesc projectA tutorial showing how to build a QSAR model using
2025-04-22His co-workers have implemented molecular docking using AutoDock 4.2 Suite with Lamarckian genetic algorithm (LGA) as shown in Fig. 16 and the predicted binding energy was found to be − 2.32 kcal/mol, that indicates a stable absorption because of potential interactions on the surface.Fig. 16Docked complex structure of UiO-66(Zr) metal organic framework (MOF) and chrysene (CRY), a toxic and hazardous polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) pollutant using AutoDock 4.2 [115]. UiO-66(Zr) MOF (receptor) and CRY (ligand) are shown in stick and ball-and-stick models, respectively. UiO-66(Zr) is marked in white, violet, and red color. Four benzene rings of CRY are marked in blue and light gray color [115]. (Color figure online)Full size imageThe calculate energy due to different types of interaction potentials, such as van der Waals, hydrogen bonding and desolvation was − 3.1 kcal/mol and electrostatic was 0.79 kcal/mol. CRY was found to show electrostatic interaction with Zr4+ ion of the MOF.To understand the cause of instant isotopic exchange reaction in silver nanoparticles cluster, Chakraborty et al. have carried out molecular docking study between two [Ag25(DMBT)18]− (DBMT for 2,4-dimethylbenzenethiol, which acts as a protecting ligand) clusters using AutoDock 4.2 with Lamarckian genetic algorithm [100, 116]. [Ag25(DMBT)18]− has been used both as receptor and ligand in the docking process. The binding energy was found to be − 23.7 kcal/mol. The docking result with least binding energy is shown in Fig. 17.Fig. 17Docked complex structure of two [Ag25(DMBT)18]− clusters using AutoDock 4.2 [100, 115]. Complex is shown in ball-and-stick model. Silver (Ag) and sulfur (S) atoms are shown in gray and yellow, respectively. C–H… π interactions are viewed in green dotted lines. Hydrogen (H) atoms and benzene rings associated with these interactions are viewed in red and blue, respectively. Other benzene rings not associated with these interactions are shown in green [116]. (Color figure online)Full size imageThe fluorescent cobalt oxide (CoO) umbelliferone nanoconjugate having anti-cancer activity can be used both as a drug and carrier. Ali et al. have conducted molecular docking studies applying the protein docking program, HEX 8.0.0 using Spherical Polar Fourier Correlations technique to find the binding interactions of the
2025-04-01CoO-drug nanoconjugate with the B-DNA dodecamer (also called as Calf thymus DNA (CT-DNA)), a DNA duplex having the sequence (CGCGAATTCGCG)2 (PDB ID: 1BNA) and human serum albumin (HSA) (PDB ID: 1H9Z) protein separately [117,118,119]. The most stable docking results with least binding energies of the CoO-drug nanoconjugate against the DNA molecule and interactions in the binding cavity of the CT-DNA are shown in Fig. 18A, B. The docking study predicted the existence of electrostatic, hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding intermolecular noncovalent interactions between them. Similarly, the most stable bound conformation of the docking result of the CoO-drug nanoconjugate and HSA protein with binding site interactions, such as hydrophobic, hydrogen bonding and metal acceptor are shown in Fig. 19A, B.Fig. 18A Molecular docking complex of calf thymus DNA (CT-DNA) (PDB ID: 1BNA) and cobalt oxide (CoO) umbelliferone drug nanoconjugate using HEX 8.0.0 [117, 118]. DNA is represented in carton and surface view. The drug nanoconjugate, a mixture of CoO nanoparticle (blue and red sphered view) and umbelliferone drug (green, red, and white sphered view). B Non-covalent interactions of DNA bases with the nanoconjugate depicted by dashed lines [117]. (Color figure online)Full size imageFig. 19A Docking result of human serum albumin (HSA) with the CoO-umbelliferone drug nanoconjugate by protein docking program, HEX 8.0.0 using Spherical Polar Fourier Correlations technique [117,118,119]. B Binding interactions of noncovalent type between neighboring amino acid residues in the binding pocket of HSA and the drug nanoconjugate shown in dashed lines [117]. (Color figure online)Full size imageInorganic–inorganicIn this case, both receptor and ligand in docking study are inorganic. The interaction study between any two chemical molecules that do not have any carbon-hydrogen bond comes under this category. To the best of our knowledge, there has not been any study carried out on inorganic receptor and ligand docking till now.Challenges in molecular dockingThere are many limitations and challenges in docking techniques [15]. A docking result predicted may not be accurate and match the result found in an experimental approach. (i) Recognition of different types of molecular features which contribute to the interaction between them can be complex, difficult to understand
2025-04-14