Edtftpj

HomeCompleteFTP vs. edtFTPj/PROCompleteFTP vs edtFTPj/PRO comparisonCompleteFTP and edtFTPj/PRO are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. CompleteFTP is ranked #25, while edtFTPj/PRO is ranked #41. CompleteFTP holds a 0.7% mindshare in MFT, compared to edtFTPj/PRO’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CompleteFTP users are willing to recommend the solution. Comparison Buyer's GuideWe performed a comparison between CompleteFTP and edtFTPj/PRO based on real PeerSpot user reviews.Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Fortra, Progress Software and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2025).Review summaries and opinionsCategories and RankingRanking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)25thRanking in other categoriesNo ranking in other categoriesRanking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)41stRanking in other categoriesNo ranking in other categoriesMindshare comparisonAs of March 2025, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of CompleteFTP is 0.7%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of edtFTPj/PRO is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.Managed File Transfer (MFT)Featured ReviewsUse our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.842,145 professionals have used our research since 2012.ComparisonsProduct ReportsOverviewSample Customers Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Fortra, Progress Software and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2025.842,145 professionals have used our research since 2012.We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

HomeCornerstone MFT vs. edtFTPj/PROSouth River Technologies and EnterpriseDT are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. South River Technologies is ranked #29, while EnterpriseDT is ranked #41. South River Technologies holds a 0.3% mindshare in MFT, compared to EnterpriseDT’s 0.1% mindshare. Comparison Buyer's GuideWe performed a comparison between Cornerstone MFT and edtFTPj/PRO based on real PeerSpot user reviews.Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Fortra, Progress Software and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2025).Review summaries and opinionsCategories and RankingRanking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)29thRanking in other categoriesNo ranking in other categoriesRanking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)41stRanking in other categoriesNo ranking in other categoriesMindshare comparisonAs of March 2025, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of Cornerstone MFT is 0.3%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of edtFTPj/PRO is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.Managed File Transfer (MFT) Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Fortra, Progress Software and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2025.842,161 professionals have used our research since 2012.ComparisonsProduct ReportsOverviewSample Customers Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Fortra, Progress Software and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2025.842,161 professionals have used our research since 2012.We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Same simple, intuitive API as the popular edtFTPj/Free client, meaning upgrades to secure transfers are very straightforward Powerful FTP command shell, useful in batch jobs or script development FTP streams for treating the remote server as a data stream Progress monitoring, permitting notification of the progress of file transfers Directory and multiple file transfers and deletes, including wildcarding Integration with log4j General Compatible with Java 1.4 and higher versions (earlier versions can be purchased) Royalty-free so no restrictions on deployment and no extra costs 版本比較 Free Robust and simple Support for all standard and many optional FTP operations and support for a very wide range of FTP servers Support for passive and active modes Resuming of binary transfers that have partially completed Simple but extensive API analogous to a command-line FTP program Includes full source code Integration with log4j Compatible with Java 1.4 and higher versions Non-LGPL licenses can be purchased if required Individual Security and value All FREE features plus… Secure FTP transfers (SFTP) Secure FTP transfers (FTPS) Support and Upgrades for 12 months Advanced file-transfer features Use by one developer Optionally includes product source code Team Best for one project development team All INDIVIDUAL features plus… Use by multiple developers who are part of the same development team at a single geographical location Use by multiple developers who are part of the same development team at multiple geographical locations Corporate Best for medium to large firms All TEAM features plus… Use by multiple developers in multiple development teams

In multiple development teams anywhere in my corporation Compatible with .NET 4.0 and higher versions Support for 32-bit and 64-bit Windows Royalty-free so no restrictions on deployment and no extra costs edtFTPj/PRO (FTP Clients for Java) 是一款利用 Java 語言編寫的 FTP 用戶端程式。使用這個程式可以幫助軟體開發人員花費最少的時間和精力而且只作少量的修改，就可以將豐富的文件傳輸功能加入到他們的軟體中。軟體支援安全性 FTP 操作；比如：FTPS（基於 SSL 的 FTP傳輸）、SFTP（通過 SSH 的 FTP 傳輸）、和防火牆協定以及運用在文件夾中的遞歸操作（包括 mget，mput）。特色 SFTP and SCP (SSH file transfer) Full support for SFTP (FTP over SSH) and SCP (secure copy) Supports password, public key and keyboard-interactive authentication Supports the use of known_hosts file for server validation as well as automatic validation Supports zlib compression Supports OpenSSH, SSH.COM, and PuTTY private key formats Supports aes128-ctr, aes192-ctr, and aes256-ctr ciphers Resuming of binary transfers that have partially completed FTPS (File transfer over SSL) Full support for explicit and implicit mode FTPS Supports TLS 1.0, 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 Supports both client and server certificate validation Support for custom server validation Supports MODE Z compression Secure data and control channels Resuming of binary transfers that have partially completed FTP Support for all standard and many optional FTP operations, passive and active modes, and support for a very wide range of FTP servers Support for FXP server-to-server transfers Resuming of binary transfers that have partially completed Proxies Full support for SOCKS 4 and SOCKS 5 proxies Support for HTTP proxies Performance Supports multiple, simultaneous transfers via connection pools Supports background transfers via a comprehensive asynchronous API Bandwidth throttling and data compression Ease of use Multi-protocol client that permits switching protocols with a single method call The