Oorexx

Author: d | 2025-04-25

Download oorexx packages for Fedora. oorexx latest versions: 5.1.0beta, 4.2.0. oorexx architectures: aarch64, x86_64. oorexx linux packages: rpm

ooRexx/INSTALL at master ooRexx/ooRexx - GitHub

The core team. If we include the gtk> runtime files it means> we also have to distribute the source for those file> because of the LGPL> license. Distributing mixed license software is not a> good idea as it> just leads to trouble. So we need some discussion on> this. But I am not> against distributing the ooRexx code and an installer> we develop on our> own.> > > Ah ... that's right, I had forgot about the GPL license.> > > So, I don't think the gtk runtime should be in the installer.> > > > But, what would be nice Perry, would be to include a readme> file that detailed exactly how the user of gtkrexx can install> the runtime themselves. > > > --> Mark Miesfeld> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:> > Build for Windows Store.> > _______________________________________________> Oorexx-devel mailing list> Oor...@li...> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:> > Build for Windows Store.> > _______________________________________________> Oorexx-devel mailing list> Oor...@li...> Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI? Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month. Vacation soon and will not be back until 8/1.As to packaging rexxgtk for Windows, I think we need some discussion onthis among the core team. If we include the gtk runtime files it meanswe also have to distribute the source for those file because of the LGPLlicense. Distributing mixed license software is not a good idea as itjust leads to trouble. So we need some discussion on this. But I am notagainst distributing the ooRexx code and an installer we develop on ourown.David Ashley From: Mark M. - 2013-07-06 16:58:13 On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 9:32 AM, David Ashley wrote:>> As to packaging rexxgtk for Windows, I think we need some discussion on> this among the core team. If we include the gtk runtime files it means> we also have to distribute the source for those file because of the LGPL> license. Distributing mixed license software is not a good idea as it> just leads to trouble. So we need some discussion on this. But I am not> against distributing the ooRexx code and an installer we develop on our> own.>Ah ... that's right, I had forgot about the GPL license.So, I don't think the gtk runtime should be in the installer.But, what would be nice Perry, would be to include a readme file thatdetailed exactly how the user of gtkrexx can install the runtimethemselves.--Mark Miesfeld From: Perry W. - 2013-07-08 11:46:11 Hi,Ok. I just looked in the gtk2 installer and it put links for the projectspage in the license page. I'll do the same in my gtk3 installer. Aboutgtkrexx I think nsis installers can download and install other packages.Doing you dont have to package the gtk runtime and keeps easy for the user. Em 06/07/2013 13:58, "Mark Miesfeld" escreveu:> On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 9:32 AM, David

Downloading File /oorexx/4.2.0/ooRexx

The 'right' way to do> the installs on Linux. I don't follow things like a "more lsb script," so> I didn't comment on the patch.>>>>>> By the way: I´m planning to build a NSIS based installer for rexxgtk on>> windows; do you thing this will be usefull?>>>> I think it would be useful. I would encourage you to do that and submit> it.>> David is also the one who did rexxgtk, so he should be the one to comment> on adding gtk3 support to rexxgtk.>> But, I'm knowledgeable about NSIS installers on Windows, so if you submit> an installer for rexxgtk I'm likely to take a close look at it.>> Ask questions on this list. "Did anyone see my patch?" seems like a> perfectly valid question to get a conversation going.>> --> Mark Miesfeld>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:>> Build for Windows Store.>> _______________________________________________> Oorexx-devel mailing list> Oor...@li...> Perry WerneckBrasília/DF From: Mark M. - 2013-07-06 14:34:36 On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Perry Werneck wrote:>> By the way: Wha´ts do you thing is the best way: Just package gtkrexx and> requires the gtk3runtime as a separated package (> ) or package the entire (and> big) gtkruntime in the gtkrexx installer? Or both?>I think that for the average user of ooRexx that might want to try gtkrexxon Windows, the biggest stumbling block is installing gtk. An installerthat installed everything so that user could just try it would be the best.An installer that had the option of installing everything needed forgtkrexx or just installing the gtkrexx files would be ideal.--Mark Miesfeld From: David A. - 2013-07-06 16:32:26 Perry -Thanks for submitting the patch. I will be incorporating it into thetrunk but it will take me a few more weeks to get it done as I amleaving on. Download oorexx packages for Fedora. oorexx latest versions: 5.1.0beta, 4.2.0. oorexx architectures: aarch64, x86_64. oorexx linux packages: rpm

Downloading File /oorexx/4.1.2/ooRexx

Ashley wrote:>>>>> As to packaging rexxgtk for Windows, I think we need some discussion on>> this among the core team. If we include the gtk runtime files it means>> we also have to distribute the source for those file because of the LGPL>> license. Distributing mixed license software is not a good idea as it>> just leads to trouble. So we need some discussion on this. But I am not>> against distributing the ooRexx code and an installer we develop on our>> own.>>>> Ah ... that's right, I had forgot about the GPL license.>> So, I don't think the gtk runtime should be in the installer.>> But, what would be nice Perry, would be to include a readme file that> detailed exactly how the user of gtkrexx can install the runtime> themselves.>> --> Mark Miesfeld>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:>> Build for Windows Store.>> _______________________________________________> Oorexx-devel mailing list> Oor...@li...> From: David A. - 2013-07-08 12:50:30 If the installer can install other external packages from a differentsource then that would be a good solution, as long as it is made clearto the user that the GTK packages are not being pulled from an ooRexxweb site.David AshleyOn Mon, 2013-07-08 at 08:46 -0300, Perry Werneck wrote:> Hi, > > Ok. I just looked in the gtk2 installer and it put links for the> projects page in the license page. I'll do the same in my gtk3> installer. About gtkrexx I think nsis installers can download and> install other packages. Doing you dont have to package the gtk runtime> and keeps easy for the user. > > > Em 06/07/2013 13:58, "Mark Miesfeld" escreveu:> On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 9:32 AM, David Ashley> wrote:> > As to packaging rexxgtk for Windows, I think we need> some discussion on> this among Summary Files Reviews Support Wiki ▾ Wiki Release 5.00 Wiki Tickets ▾ Bugs Feature Requests Documentation Bugs Patches Support Requests Tasks Test Cases Mailing Lists Discussion News Code SVN Repository Code CVS Repository Menu ▾ ▴ From: Perry W. - 2013-07-04 00:50:29 Hi,Not sure if this is the right list but was the best way to contribute toooRexx? I already open 2 tickets with patches (*) on the sourceforge pagebut I´m not sure if there´s someone monitoring it. Am I doing it right?By the way: I´m planning to build a NSIS based installer for rexxgtk onwindows; do you thing this will be usefull?(*) one adding support for gtk3 on rexxgtk, other changing the rxapidservice on linux to a more "lsb" script to avoid some hangs I was gettingin OpenSUSE.-- Perry WerneckBrasília/DF From: Mark M. - 2013-07-04 03:12:34 On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Perry Werneck wrote:>> Not sure if this is the right list but was the best way to contribute to> ooRexx? I already open 2 tickets with patches (*) on the sourceforge page> but I´m not sure if there´s someone monitoring it. Am I doing it right?>Hi Perry,This is the right list, and submitting patches is the best way tocontribute.Someone is monitoring the patches tickets, I saw your patches. We don'talways have time to act on things right away.So, I think you are doing this just right - submit a patch and then discussit on this list to get the other developers input.I usually defer to David when it comes to what is the 'right' way to do theinstalls on Linux. I don't follow things like a "more lsb script," so Ididn't comment on the patch.>> By the way: I´m planning to build a NSIS based installer for rexxgtk on> windows; do you thing this will

Pull requests ooRexx/ooRexx - GitHub

Be usefull?>I think it would be useful. I would encourage you to do that and submit it.David is also the one who did rexxgtk, so he should be the one to commenton adding gtk3 support to rexxgtk.But, I'm knowledgeable about NSIS installers on Windows, so if you submitan installer for rexxgtk I'm likely to take a close look at it.Ask questions on this list. "Did anyone see my patch?" seems like aperfectly valid question to get a conversation going.--Mark Miesfeld From: Perry W. - 2013-07-04 23:45:12 Hi,Thanks! I'll start with the packaging of the rexxgtk as soon as I get sometime.By the way: Wha´ts do you thing is the best way: Just package gtkrexx andrequires the gtk3runtime as a separated package ( ) or package the entire (and big)gtkruntime in the gtkrexx installer? Or both?In other project (pw3270 - 3270´s terminal emulator) I´m installing theentire gtkruntime in the application folder; easy to guarantee the gtkversion but far more dificult to do an automated software distributionbecause of the file size.2013/7/4 Mark Miesfeld > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Perry Werneck wrote:>>>>> Not sure if this is the right list but was the best way to contribute to>> ooRexx? I already open 2 tickets with patches (*) on the sourceforge page>> but I´m not sure if there´s someone monitoring it. Am I doing it right?>>>> Hi Perry,>> This is the right list, and submitting patches is the best way to> contribute.>> Someone is monitoring the patches tickets, I saw your patches. We don't> always have time to act on things right away.>> So, I think you are doing this just right - submit a patch and then> discuss it on this list to get the other developers input.>> I usually defer to David when it comes to what is

Download ooRexx-5.0. .windows.x86_64.exe (ooRexx

. Download oorexx packages for Fedora. oorexx latest versions: 5.1.0beta, 4.2.0. oorexx architectures: aarch64, x86_64. oorexx linux packages: rpm I.e, a 32-bit package for a 32-bit ooRexx and a 64-bit package for a 64-bit ooRexx. The installer will detect the installed ooRexx, location and version. If the ooRexx version is less than 4.1.0, or if there is no installed ooRexx, the installer will abort with a

oorexx/INSTALL at master racketscience/oorexx - GitHub