Sites like flickr

Author: J | 2025-04-24

★★★★☆ (4.9 / 2370 reviews)

lightbox web

However, there are many sites like Flickr that are truly amazing. We decided to search the internet for the best Flickr alternatives available. With these sites like Flickr, you will

dvdstyler 3.2.1 (32 bit)

10 Best Flickr Alternatives and Sites Like Flickr

People came back from Ipernity is that the idiots who had a lot of sway on Ipernity didn't like groups .Ipernity had some other deal-breaker for me (I don't care about groups), some other limitation that was unacceptable, so I sucked it up and came back to Flickr (I was away for maybe a day!).I didn't like the 2013 changes at all, but they didn't actually kill the usefulness of the site, and in time I got used to them.I've never seen on any other platform the same combination of powerful organizational features Flickr has. Ipernity came closest. Posted 78 months ago. ( permalink ) The Searcher says: Moxy Fruvous: As staff have said, apparently only 3% of all free accounts have more than 1000 photos in them. That's still a lot of accounts, but not exactly what you could call "most of the subscriber base." Posted 78 months ago. ( permalink ) HaarFager says: Do check out Ipernity. They had problems in 2013, but have got new owners and Ipernity just works like Flickr used to. And before anybody here says they haven't made an effort to improve the site - that's why it works - if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Sites don't need to have to be continually "upgraded" to still be effective. Posted 78 months ago. ( permalink ) kiwijellyjam says: HaarFager (Pro): Thanks! I'd forgotten what a user friendly photo site looked like. Posted 78 months ago. ( permalink ) Martha_Octavian says: Adobe Cloud may be better for hosting, but it is significantly more expensive and you will miss the friends, groups, commenting etc. Flickr is unique and it will get better. Stay here if you care about sharing and seeing beautiful pictures. Posted 78 months ago. ( permalink ) twacar says: I've checked out many sites, including Ipernity, and I must say I am quite dissatisfied with the majority of sites I've looked at. These are the reasons why I disliked other photo sharing sites I've looked at:1. Layout was outdated and needs to move on2. Too much focus on competitions3. No stats whatsoever4. No groups nor albums functions5. Sizes you're able to post6. Copyright options7. Unable to edit photos8. Adding info to photos9. Designed for photo storage and not sharingThese are my issues with other sites, including Ipernity, Instagram, Facebook, Gurushots, Google Photos and many others. And although many of these sites to have elements I do like, they also leave out key elements I need to have.Don't get me wrong, there's lots to improve on Flickr and with the new announcement for the Pro features/cost, I will be thinking long and hard when my renewal comes up in a few months.Unlike many others on the site, I wont be running to another site here and now, I've paid for my membership until June 2019 so why not use the site fully until then. It will give me the time I need to see if there's another option that offers the services Broke, don't fix it. Sites don't need to have to be continually "upgraded" to still be effective. Posted 78 months ago. ( permalink ) kiwijellyjam says: HaarFager (Pro): Thanks! I'd forgotten what a user friendly photo site looked like. Posted 78 months ago. ( permalink ) Martha_Octavian says: Adobe Cloud may be better for hosting, but it is significantly more expensive and you will miss the friends, groups, commenting etc. Flickr is unique and it will get better. Stay here if you care about sharing and seeing beautiful pictures. Posted 78 months ago. ( permalink ) twacar says: I've checked out many sites, including Ipernity, and I must say I am quite dissatisfied with the majority of sites I've looked at. These are the reasons why I disliked other photo sharing sites I've looked at:1. Layout was outdated and needs to move on2. Too much focus on competitions3. No stats whatsoever4. No groups nor albums functions5. Sizes you're able to post6. Copyright options7. Unable to edit photos8. Adding info to photos9. Designed for photo storage and not sharingThese are my issues with other sites, including Ipernity, Instagram, Facebook, Gurushots, Google Photos and many others. And although many of these sites to have elements I do like, they also leave out key elements I need to have.Don't get me wrong, there's lots to improve on Flickr and with the new announcement for the Pro features/cost, I will be thinking long and hard when my renewal comes up in a few months.Unlike many others on the site, I wont be running to another site here and now, I've paid for my membership until June 2019 so why not use the site fully until then. It will give me the time I need to see if there's another option that offers the services I am looking for in a photo sharing site. Posted 78 months ago. ( permalink ) Eusiceidragi says: Flickr still has a lot of issues, but I think it is has good leadership now. They are cleaning the house by getting rid of the 1tb free account (I have two

7 Sites Like Flickr - TechShout

The site's layout seems disorganized and poorly designed.You can, of course, host photos on your own website. That can be free through sites like Wordpress. Fees are applied depending on the functionality and storage required. It is easy to self-build a simple site with low functionality.So, I returned to one of the first hosting sites I used.Flickr is now owned by SmugMug, the photo-sharing website host geared toward professional photographers. Flickr was once hugely popular. However, its popularity has waned over the years. That is a shame because it is an excellent platform for sharing images, especially since it gives control over whether third parties can download pictures. To extend beyond the free uploading of 1,000 photos to unlimited uploads, one must buy a premium subscription, which also gives ad-free browsing and unlimited private images. Flickr is $66.48 per year (with a two-year contract), a much better value than Fotki.You can put links to Flickr-hosted images on other social media and choose how much of its metadata is shared there. However, Facebook seems to restrict viewing posts with hyperlinks, expecting users to pay for them. Also, Flickr does not allow the storage of raw files.So, I didn't find what I was looking for. There was no winner. Perhaps if you are a software developer looking to make the next big thing on the internet, there's a place to start. I need a joint storage and social sharing platform for creators. It must never abuse our personal data, accept raw files, and be cost-effective. It must appeal to a broad audience, so everyone will want to join. Plus, it can't be filled with mindless reels or have "Like" buttons.Have you any suggestions of what I should use? It would be great to discuss them in the comments.. However, there are many sites like Flickr that are truly amazing. We decided to search the internet for the best Flickr alternatives available. With these sites like Flickr, you will

Photo sites like flickr - lmkapromo

( permalink ) Fabio Keiner says: well, as an alternative highly recommendable would be youpic - a swedish site (and as far as I know still with illimitable amount of uploads for free?)the well known 500px - now in chinese hands (which may imply further censorship on certain issues/topics), but only 5 photos a week for freeboth worldwide monster-sites with rather good photographers, both are charging for pro-accounts, of course.the above mentioned flickr-alternative ipernity - they exactly now announce to delete all pics above the limit of 200 and charge for pro-accounts - it's like flickr, but very small and restricted :)...the problem with flickr's recent turn is imho their brute force attempt on those very few - 3 % of all! - users, who uploaded more than 1000 pics: life or money! :))whilst offering a terabyte for free was a desperate foolish try then to attract people when flickr was losing members en masse, now offering e.g. 10k of images would work for almost 99% (including myself:)) of all free-accounteers. without any threatening of delete/expulsion.to be honest: a photo-site (which retains all rights of selling/merchandise/etc. of them!) should PAY photographers who offer and post their images here - instead of demanding a fee for giving them your works!finally, my last recommendation:micromosso - a very small italian (but also in english) photo-forum/site for serious photographers. Posted 77 months ago. ( permalink ) Fabio Keiner says: well, as an alternative highly recommendable would be youpic - a swedish site (and as far as I know still with illimitable amount of uploads for free?)the well known 500px - now in chinese hands (which may imply further censorship on certain issues/topics), but only 5 photos a week for freeboth worldwide monster-sites with rather good photographers, both are charging for pro-accounts, of course.the above mentioned flickr-alternative ipernity - they exactly now announce to delete all pics above the limit of 200 and charge for pro-accounts - it's like flickr, but very small and restricted :)...the problem with flickr's recent turn is imho their brute force attempt on those very few - 3 % of It with the mobile/cell phone companies? The main spammers on our forums are those selling phones, or offering to make knock-off copies. We've seen sites in the past on these forums with downloads from flickr, the main carriers over charge with extortionate rates if you want to use the damn thing abroad. Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) Dr. Keats says: They're preying on those gullible dumb-asses who aren't capable of simply using a 'phone for making 'phone calls - ring-tones, wallpapers, games, SMS dating lines, and all that shit... Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) Alfie | Japanorama says: "What is it with the mobile/cell phone companies? "Or, what is it with these image hosting companies who - despite opening up their code for all and sundry - seem to make the entire responsibility for copyright ours????The API is enabling mass infringement. Flickr, when you are back from your holidays perhaps you would please do something about this.Thanks.Plus, how about making this integration with Piknik a little more user friendly; like being able to add a watermark to all your Flickr files easily, rather than having to do it one at a time at the moment? Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) Alfie | Japanorama edited this topic ages ago. striatic says: why is everyone so sure that this this site is powered by the flickr API? Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) i_am_curiouskiwi says: The photos returned are sorted by interestingness... so my assumption is that it's a tag search by interestingness... not an RSS feed, for example. The easiest way to do that is using the API, isn't it?Although, seeing how it doesn't return every search, it may be a series of hard-coded queries... although why it would hardcode a search for "curiouskiwi" is beyond me. :) Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) Walwyn says: Why would it be any different to the rest?API, RSS, tag search, badge, hardly any of these 'giveaway flickr image' sites actually invest in technology of their own. Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) Alfie | Japanorama says: Because Striatic that would be the most logical way of doing it, the easiest and the way that most people do it. Hence my asking how organised Flickr are about policing the people who use their API. Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) Alfie | Japanorama edited this topic ages ago. Walwyn says: I'm no longer seeing flickr images on the site. My tags don't turn up, and the 'cats' search is just returning lolcat stuff. If you still have direct links they'll show but I don't think the search is returning stuff. Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) Walwyn edited this topic ages

11 best Flickr alternatives and sites like Flickr (2025

(101 to 200 of 164 replies in [Closed] Alternative hosting sites.) sushimustwrite says: dokkerhoo777:Photoblog! That's what I forgot to mention. I read good, really.We're starting work on an iPhoto plugin very soon. Lightroom and Aperture are also pretty popularly requested and are on the roadmap.As for a photoblog, if you're already using WordPress we have a plugin for embedding your uploaded Trovebox photos in a post, so you could effectively turn your WP site into a photoblog: wordpress.org/extend/plugins/openphoto/ That's probably the most straightforward way.And I opened an issue for tiff support (well, more filetypes since there wasn't one for raw either). github.com/photo/frontend/issues/1270 You can follow it if you like. Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) bootload says: dokkerhoo777 says: sushimustwrite:Awesome ! Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) KirstenDeLaet says: 500px.com1x.comboth are very good alternatives for the new "flashy" flickr, or u can use Dropbox.com imgur.com :) Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) dokkerhoo777 says: SeventiesPhotography:500px looks pretty amazing. Never heard of it before. Thank you. Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) spectacular wind says: SD Anderson says: Unfortunately, any photo-sharing website that you move to may also make major changes somewhere down the line. I created the Webshots groups on flickr last October when Webshots became a sinking ship. I took in over 600 Webshots refugees and gave them a stepping stone so they could adjust to a new photo-sharing website. In the process, they became reunited with old friends from Webshots. Webshots was a pioneer photo-sharing site - one of the largest and oldest photo sharing sites on the web. The owners who created it sold it to CNet. They in turn sold it to Hallmark. Hallmark sold it back to the original owners again. But rather than continue the site in community fashion as it had been for many years, they put Webshots on the cloud and photos went private - only f&f can view them now... and they have to purchase a subscription to be able to see each other's photos.This is what I'm fearful of what may happen to flickr. These older sites are trying to keep up with the great social-networking hype. They're changing their services to mimick social networking as it tends to attract $$-hoards of people-$$. Google did it with all of their services. They've integrated Youtube, Blogger, and Picasaweb into their G+ structure. But still the one thing Google lacks is the community. I can't think of a single photo-sharing website that has a strong community structure like flickr does.I think our best bet is to ride the storm for now and hope that flickr will make improvements down the line. Once you get a few people bashing new changes, most others tend to jump on the bandwagon and join in on the bashing. Personally, I don't hate the changes. I just don't like the large photos on the stream pages and my only suggestion is to give users the ability to adjust the size of the images and the number per

Sites Like Flickr – Top 5 Flickr Alternative Websites

Still works with the new flickr site. For the record, I don't like the new look. The small square thumbnails were perfect for easy viewing, the "never ending" google images style page of images is a pain in the arse.I don't think @ $25 a year to get stats and no adverts is good value for money. I shall be looking for an alternative and voting with my feet.Maybe this is Yahoo's way of finally killing off Flickr. Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) bcg~art says: Just looked at ipernity. The intro page looks like the old flickr, but I see no option for a "tour", so I can check it out first. Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) ambitious whistle says: just contacted ipernity and they hope to have a system in place within 24 hours to bulk download all of your flickr photos plus titles, descriptions, tags, permissions etc., so that may well be the way to go for us long time pros with thousands of photos who aren't wanted any more at flickr Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) *CA* says: Last night I used BulkrPro to download my 5,230 photos from Flickr. So now I have all of my photos as well as a text file for each with the title, caption text,t, and tags, I don't see exif data embedded in the photo file. Maybe I didn't check something correctly and will have to try again.BUT I have all my photos and my text backed up. That's important to me because I often write short vignettes to go with my images.Now to find another site. I will really miss the community of contacts I've built up since 2005.Bulkr website:clipyourphotos.com/bulkr Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) maetang says: Thanks for starting this topic, and for the people making suggestions of alternative sties. I am currently checking out ipertnity, Trovebox and 500px. 1X seems a little pricey for my needs, but the other sites offer some pretty good paid services, which makes me hopeful. Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) vigorous cub says: a,a,a,...forget this Fuckrrush: IPERNITY Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) cookie1234 says: How much does it cost to use ipernity and does it have unlimited downloads? I went to the ipernity website and there is no info on this unless, I suppose, one joins the group. Well, alternative websites may not even be the answer. Once these sites get oodles of new joiners, it too will probably go the way of the world, raise the price while getting lazy re: layout design. We may have no choice in the future but to pay for garbage. Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) cookie1234 edited this topic ages ago. suziqb says: I too have opened an account at ipernity Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) diligent shape says: Rob Johnstone:"I don't think @ $25 a year to get stats and no adverts is good value for money. I shall be looking for an alternative and voting. However, there are many sites like Flickr that are truly amazing. We decided to search the internet for the best Flickr alternatives available. With these sites like Flickr, you will

Sites Like Flickr Top 5 Flickr Alternative Websites

(1 to 100 of 133 replies) shoothead says: Oh my god. ages ago (permalink) Walwyn says: Is google broken again? ages ago (permalink) Brian.H says: Kill me now... ages ago (permalink) Enlightened Fellow says: *laughs* ages ago (permalink) Trazy says: Where's TH when you need him? ages ago (permalink) Mark Zuid says: Whatever you do ... Don't say his name 3 times!!! ages ago (permalink) Lisanne! says: Zoomr? Probably just another flash in the pan imitation of Flickr.Do I see Thomas Hawk entering the room? ages ago (permalink) sincere division [deleted] says: LOL , been there done that , came back home to Flickr. ages ago (permalink) Mr Jaded says: I never understand why the staff of any company think it's a good idea put mugshots of themselves on their web sites. Even when they are super models, even when they are photoshopped to perfection, it's always a big turn off. Particularly in this case where the unkind lense, under hard lighting, shot through a freakish fish eye lense turns each well meaning face into a hideous intimidating gargoyle.(I didn't make it past this page) ages ago (permalink) Lisanne! says: Actually, I admire the man whose name we shant say three times. I just don't care very much for Zoomr as it is today. ages ago (permalink) Brock says: L J: Just as we asked Thomas himself to tone it down, can the constant and utterly blatant plugs for Zooomr be toned down, please?If you love it so much, maybe prove it by being there... ages ago (permalink) Tampen says: And a simple search of FlickrCentral would have told you so much more than anyone could possibly ever want to know about that Z word....... ages ago (permalink) sgoralnick says: LJ: here's some TH Originally posted ages ago. (permalink) sgoralnick edited this topic ages ago. magnificent act [deleted] says: Holy buckets! what is the name not to say 3 times? ages ago (permalink) Enlightened Fellow says: Lisanne! says: Yeah, Flickr is just a shell of its old self. It's kinda sad, they used to have billions of members. Last time I checked it was down to only 234.Ah Flickr, we knew you well. ages ago (permalink) gms says: flickr has supposedly lost most of its great photographers to that site. Which leaves all of us crap ones I guess. ages ago (permalink) Enlightened Fellow says: It is a sad existance... ages ago (permalink) FLC says: I dunno, I could reel off a BAJILLION truly great sunset photographers who reside here ages ago (permalink) StevenM_61 says: Flickr is now just struggling to survive after losing all of its German members to Ipernity and other member flocking to sites like Zooomr. I guess I'll go back to Webshots and Photobucket. ages ago (permalink) Lisanne! says: They're both fine sites, Steven. But that you would desert a sinking ship is disappointing. I thought that you would be one of the last holdouts. ages ago (permalink) RubyMae says: And this thread has not been

Comments

User8083

People came back from Ipernity is that the idiots who had a lot of sway on Ipernity didn't like groups .Ipernity had some other deal-breaker for me (I don't care about groups), some other limitation that was unacceptable, so I sucked it up and came back to Flickr (I was away for maybe a day!).I didn't like the 2013 changes at all, but they didn't actually kill the usefulness of the site, and in time I got used to them.I've never seen on any other platform the same combination of powerful organizational features Flickr has. Ipernity came closest. Posted 78 months ago. ( permalink ) The Searcher says: Moxy Fruvous: As staff have said, apparently only 3% of all free accounts have more than 1000 photos in them. That's still a lot of accounts, but not exactly what you could call "most of the subscriber base." Posted 78 months ago. ( permalink ) HaarFager says: Do check out Ipernity. They had problems in 2013, but have got new owners and Ipernity just works like Flickr used to. And before anybody here says they haven't made an effort to improve the site - that's why it works - if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Sites don't need to have to be continually "upgraded" to still be effective. Posted 78 months ago. ( permalink ) kiwijellyjam says: HaarFager (Pro): Thanks! I'd forgotten what a user friendly photo site looked like. Posted 78 months ago. ( permalink ) Martha_Octavian says: Adobe Cloud may be better for hosting, but it is significantly more expensive and you will miss the friends, groups, commenting etc. Flickr is unique and it will get better. Stay here if you care about sharing and seeing beautiful pictures. Posted 78 months ago. ( permalink ) twacar says: I've checked out many sites, including Ipernity, and I must say I am quite dissatisfied with the majority of sites I've looked at. These are the reasons why I disliked other photo sharing sites I've looked at:1. Layout was outdated and needs to move on2. Too much focus on competitions3. No stats whatsoever4. No groups nor albums functions5. Sizes you're able to post6. Copyright options7. Unable to edit photos8. Adding info to photos9. Designed for photo storage and not sharingThese are my issues with other sites, including Ipernity, Instagram, Facebook, Gurushots, Google Photos and many others. And although many of these sites to have elements I do like, they also leave out key elements I need to have.Don't get me wrong, there's lots to improve on Flickr and with the new announcement for the Pro features/cost, I will be thinking long and hard when my renewal comes up in a few months.Unlike many others on the site, I wont be running to another site here and now, I've paid for my membership until June 2019 so why not use the site fully until then. It will give me the time I need to see if there's another option that offers the services

2025-04-12
User3999

Broke, don't fix it. Sites don't need to have to be continually "upgraded" to still be effective. Posted 78 months ago. ( permalink ) kiwijellyjam says: HaarFager (Pro): Thanks! I'd forgotten what a user friendly photo site looked like. Posted 78 months ago. ( permalink ) Martha_Octavian says: Adobe Cloud may be better for hosting, but it is significantly more expensive and you will miss the friends, groups, commenting etc. Flickr is unique and it will get better. Stay here if you care about sharing and seeing beautiful pictures. Posted 78 months ago. ( permalink ) twacar says: I've checked out many sites, including Ipernity, and I must say I am quite dissatisfied with the majority of sites I've looked at. These are the reasons why I disliked other photo sharing sites I've looked at:1. Layout was outdated and needs to move on2. Too much focus on competitions3. No stats whatsoever4. No groups nor albums functions5. Sizes you're able to post6. Copyright options7. Unable to edit photos8. Adding info to photos9. Designed for photo storage and not sharingThese are my issues with other sites, including Ipernity, Instagram, Facebook, Gurushots, Google Photos and many others. And although many of these sites to have elements I do like, they also leave out key elements I need to have.Don't get me wrong, there's lots to improve on Flickr and with the new announcement for the Pro features/cost, I will be thinking long and hard when my renewal comes up in a few months.Unlike many others on the site, I wont be running to another site here and now, I've paid for my membership until June 2019 so why not use the site fully until then. It will give me the time I need to see if there's another option that offers the services I am looking for in a photo sharing site. Posted 78 months ago. ( permalink ) Eusiceidragi says: Flickr still has a lot of issues, but I think it is has good leadership now. They are cleaning the house by getting rid of the 1tb free account (I have two

2025-04-20
User9538

The site's layout seems disorganized and poorly designed.You can, of course, host photos on your own website. That can be free through sites like Wordpress. Fees are applied depending on the functionality and storage required. It is easy to self-build a simple site with low functionality.So, I returned to one of the first hosting sites I used.Flickr is now owned by SmugMug, the photo-sharing website host geared toward professional photographers. Flickr was once hugely popular. However, its popularity has waned over the years. That is a shame because it is an excellent platform for sharing images, especially since it gives control over whether third parties can download pictures. To extend beyond the free uploading of 1,000 photos to unlimited uploads, one must buy a premium subscription, which also gives ad-free browsing and unlimited private images. Flickr is $66.48 per year (with a two-year contract), a much better value than Fotki.You can put links to Flickr-hosted images on other social media and choose how much of its metadata is shared there. However, Facebook seems to restrict viewing posts with hyperlinks, expecting users to pay for them. Also, Flickr does not allow the storage of raw files.So, I didn't find what I was looking for. There was no winner. Perhaps if you are a software developer looking to make the next big thing on the internet, there's a place to start. I need a joint storage and social sharing platform for creators. It must never abuse our personal data, accept raw files, and be cost-effective. It must appeal to a broad audience, so everyone will want to join. Plus, it can't be filled with mindless reels or have "Like" buttons.Have you any suggestions of what I should use? It would be great to discuss them in the comments.

2025-04-09
User2672

( permalink ) Fabio Keiner says: well, as an alternative highly recommendable would be youpic - a swedish site (and as far as I know still with illimitable amount of uploads for free?)the well known 500px - now in chinese hands (which may imply further censorship on certain issues/topics), but only 5 photos a week for freeboth worldwide monster-sites with rather good photographers, both are charging for pro-accounts, of course.the above mentioned flickr-alternative ipernity - they exactly now announce to delete all pics above the limit of 200 and charge for pro-accounts - it's like flickr, but very small and restricted :)...the problem with flickr's recent turn is imho their brute force attempt on those very few - 3 % of all! - users, who uploaded more than 1000 pics: life or money! :))whilst offering a terabyte for free was a desperate foolish try then to attract people when flickr was losing members en masse, now offering e.g. 10k of images would work for almost 99% (including myself:)) of all free-accounteers. without any threatening of delete/expulsion.to be honest: a photo-site (which retains all rights of selling/merchandise/etc. of them!) should PAY photographers who offer and post their images here - instead of demanding a fee for giving them your works!finally, my last recommendation:micromosso - a very small italian (but also in english) photo-forum/site for serious photographers. Posted 77 months ago. ( permalink ) Fabio Keiner says: well, as an alternative highly recommendable would be youpic - a swedish site (and as far as I know still with illimitable amount of uploads for free?)the well known 500px - now in chinese hands (which may imply further censorship on certain issues/topics), but only 5 photos a week for freeboth worldwide monster-sites with rather good photographers, both are charging for pro-accounts, of course.the above mentioned flickr-alternative ipernity - they exactly now announce to delete all pics above the limit of 200 and charge for pro-accounts - it's like flickr, but very small and restricted :)...the problem with flickr's recent turn is imho their brute force attempt on those very few - 3 % of

2025-04-22
User6488

It with the mobile/cell phone companies? The main spammers on our forums are those selling phones, or offering to make knock-off copies. We've seen sites in the past on these forums with downloads from flickr, the main carriers over charge with extortionate rates if you want to use the damn thing abroad. Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) Dr. Keats says: They're preying on those gullible dumb-asses who aren't capable of simply using a 'phone for making 'phone calls - ring-tones, wallpapers, games, SMS dating lines, and all that shit... Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) Alfie | Japanorama says: "What is it with the mobile/cell phone companies? "Or, what is it with these image hosting companies who - despite opening up their code for all and sundry - seem to make the entire responsibility for copyright ours????The API is enabling mass infringement. Flickr, when you are back from your holidays perhaps you would please do something about this.Thanks.Plus, how about making this integration with Piknik a little more user friendly; like being able to add a watermark to all your Flickr files easily, rather than having to do it one at a time at the moment? Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) Alfie | Japanorama edited this topic ages ago. striatic says: why is everyone so sure that this this site is powered by the flickr API? Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) i_am_curiouskiwi says: The photos returned are sorted by interestingness... so my assumption is that it's a tag search by interestingness... not an RSS feed, for example. The easiest way to do that is using the API, isn't it?Although, seeing how it doesn't return every search, it may be a series of hard-coded queries... although why it would hardcode a search for "curiouskiwi" is beyond me. :) Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) Walwyn says: Why would it be any different to the rest?API, RSS, tag search, badge, hardly any of these 'giveaway flickr image' sites actually invest in technology of their own. Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) Alfie | Japanorama says: Because Striatic that would be the most logical way of doing it, the easiest and the way that most people do it. Hence my asking how organised Flickr are about policing the people who use their API. Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) Alfie | Japanorama edited this topic ages ago. Walwyn says: I'm no longer seeing flickr images on the site. My tags don't turn up, and the 'cats' search is just returning lolcat stuff. If you still have direct links they'll show but I don't think the search is returning stuff. Posted ages ago. ( permalink ) Walwyn edited this topic ages

2025-03-26

Add Comment